If you try to compare the numbers of people getting cancer through the years until today, you will be certainly shocked how they increased. Back in the 1900’s, one person out of 100 people had the risk of getting a cancer, in the 1950’s the numbers increased to 1 person out of 50, and nowadays, even 1 in 3 persons has the chance of getting cancer and it can increase up to 1 in 2 people in the future.
What would you do in case you get cancer?
You can chose one of the 2 options: either chemotherapy or organic natural ingredients. If you didn’t already know, even 75% of the doctors have declined chemotherapy because it is only effective in 2-3% and which has been proved to stimulate the growth of cancer rather than destroying it. On the other hand, the natural ingredients are considered to be highly effective cancer cures without any negatvie effects.
The doctors have profit of prescribing the toxic drugs people use during chemotherapy, so they insist on chemotherapy, and unfortunately some people continue receiving this treatment.
Read this article and put an end to the chemotherapy and the cancer industry.
Science shows that the untreated live longer
Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a professor of Medical Physics and Physiology at Berkeley, California, presented shocking results through an American Cancer Society Seminar in 1969, after 25 years of researching the life of patients suffering from cancer.
When he compared the lives of those who were treated in conventional ways with chemotherapy like radiation and surgery with the ones who were not, he concluded that the previous ones died faster.
His paperwork named “Demographic Consideration of the Cancer Problem” was published in Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences (Series II, Vol. 18, pp. 298-333).
The results of the discovery about the rate of survival of women dealing with breast cancer who rejected conventional ways of treatment showed that lived 4 times longer than women who were treated with some of the convetional ways.
“People who refused treatments lived for an average of 12 and a half years. Those who accepted other kinds of treatment lived on an average of only 3 years”, stated Dr. Hardin B. Jones.
However, there are also other researches who concluded the same thing, like the study conducted at the Harvard School of Public Health, the biologist Dr. Maurice Fox from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology concluded the following: “Those who refused medical procedures had a lower mortality rate than those who submitted”.
Here are some things we will present you that were shown by Dr. Maurice’s article about the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on February the 2nd, 1979, such as:
- Early diagnosis led to faster treatment and earlier death.
- Total mastectomy was nothing than simple lump removal.
- Those who accepted conventional treatments died faster than those who did not.
In 1978, Dr. Michael Feldman and his team conducted a study at the Weizmann Institute in Israel.
An article named “Failure of Chemotherapy to Prolong Survival in a Group of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer” published on March the 15th,1980 by the British medical journal The Lancet, said: “Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past 10 years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastasis. Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy…. Actuarial survival analysis … reveals no prolongation in overall survival, despite the increased use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The survival of the 78 patients who received chemotherapy from first detection of metastases (including single-agent chemotherapy) was no better than that of the 80 who did not receive chemotherapy. There was also no improvement in survival for those who received multiple-drug chemotherapy (66 patients)…. The fact that regressions of breast cancer had no influence on overall survival must reflect the inadequacy of present-day chemotherapy.”
How Lethal is Chemotherapy?
How lethal it is, is shown by the example of burning the human flesh when applied on patient’s hand.
The image on the left shows the burning and scarring which was caused by spilling chemotherapy fluid on a bare hand.
This is a terrifying fact, since we all know that the outer human’s skin is better protected that the insides, so you can imagine what the fluid does when injected venously in the patient.
Nurses have to wear personal protective equipment when treating patients with it, so this is another thing that shows the harmfulness of this chemical.
Spills larger than 5 cc. require:
- Two pairs of gloves ( a rubber pair on the top, and latex pair for underneath the coveralls), and protective coveralls as well.
- Phone calls to the Occupational & Environmelntal Safety Office (OESO) and to 911.
- The affected area must be marked with warning signs, and the access must me blocked off.
- Picking up broken glass using the scoop in the “Chemotherapy spill kit”.
- Washing the spill area 3 times: with hydrogen peroxide and 2 times with a strong detergent.
- If during the procedure the chemotherapy drug comes in contact with the eyes or the skin of the nurses, or if they inhale airborne particles, they are instructed to immediately go to the emergency room.
After reading the consequences of this medicine method, you can decide on your own whether to undergo those terrible damaging poisons, or you will choose to treat your condition more safely and cheaply, because remember, once you are diagnosed with cancer, you become worth $300.000 to the cancer industry . However, if you choose to treat cancer with natural ingredients offered by the nature, you can be sure that there will be no negative side effects at all.